A Guide to Choosing the Best ESG Framework for your Organization
ESG, or environmental, social, and governance, is discussed at the highest tables in an organization as it evolves from a ‘nice to have’ effort to a strategic imperative. Rising climate change concerns, efforts to ramp up competitive advantage, and investors leaning toward non-financial metrics to analyze better returns have catalyzed the shift toward a greater focus on ESG initiatives.
Exploring various ESG strategies and frameworks is essential to understanding their benefits and applicability to different organizational contexts. Identifying the most effective model and finding the one that aligns best with an organization's unique goals and challenges is crucial. By doing so, companies can adopt an ESG approach that enhances their sustainability and ethical standing and aligns with their strategic objectives, thereby creating a more holistic and impactful approach to business sustainability.
What is ESG and why is it important?
ESG, or Environmental, Social, and Governance, is a framework crucial in the contemporary business and investment landscape, focusing on three core areas: environmental stewardship, social responsibility, and governance practices. The environmental aspect scrutinizes a company's ecological impact and sustainability practices, such as climate change policies, carbon emissions, and resource management. The social dimension evaluates how a company interacts with its employees, suppliers, customers, and communities, encompassing labor practices, diversity, and community engagement. Governance involves assessing a company's leadership, compliance, ethical standards, internal controls, and shareholder rights.
The importance of ESG initiatives lies in its significant impact on value creation and risk management. Companies with strong ESG propositions are likelier to experience higher equity returns and reduced risks. The global rise in sustainable investments indicated by over $30 trillion in fund flows in 2019, a 68% rise since 2014, underscores ESG's growing relevance in the business landscape based on a report published by McKinsey. Today, over 90% of S&P 500 organizations publicly report ESG metrics.
ESG initiatives create value by fostering growth, reducing costs, and increasing employee productivity. However, implementing ESG principles requires a strategic balance between short-term costs and long-term benefits, demanding proactive and transparent approaches from companies. ESG represents a holistic approach to business operations, emphasizing sustainability, ethical practices, and long-term value creation.
What are ESG frameworks?
ESG models and frameworks have become integral in guiding companies and investors toward sustainable and responsible business practices. These models provide structured approaches to assess and publicly report data on an organization's operations, risks, and opportunities related to environmental sustainability, social responsibility, and governance practices. They vary in focus, methodology, reporting frequency, and application, catering to different stakeholder needs and regulatory environments. While some frameworks are mandatory, some are voluntary.
Comparison of ESG frameworks
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): GRI offers a globally applicable guidance framework with standards detailing approaches to materiality, management reporting, and disclosure for a comprehensive range of sustainability issues. It guides organizations in producing sustainability reports on material topics, using three universal and topic-specific standards for economic, environmental, or social issues. It allows for flexibility in reporting, enabling organizations to focus on issues most relevant to them and their stakeholders. This flexibility makes the framework ideal for companies starting their ESG journey, as it forms a solid basis for reporting over time. GRI reigns supreme as the go-to reporting framework, with 82% of the world's top 250 corporations crafting their reports following GRI Standards, as per a publication by Bloomberg Law.
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB): Now part of the Value Reporting Foundation (VRF), SASB sets standards for disclosing financially material sustainability information to investors. It tracks ESG issues across 77 industry standards, allowing organizations to report with transparency and relevancy to their investors. This framework provides sector-specific information on various ESG topics, including greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, water management, and employee health.
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD): TCFD provides general as well as sector-specific guidance focused on governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets related to only climate-related risks and opportunities. It helps organizations articulate how ESG performance impacts future financial performance and value creation.
Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP): CDP provides companies, states, regions, and cities a framework for environmental information disclosure, covering governance, policy, risk management, environmental targets, and strategy. It offers questionnaires on climate change, water, and forests, scored using different methodologies.
Which ESG framework is the best?
Understanding which ESG framework is the best and most appropriate for your organization requires an in-depth analysis of several factors. Here are some criteria for evaluating the suitability of ESG models for a business:
Define materiality
With a plethora of ESG metrics to report on, companies may struggle to decide what to prioritize. Frameworks break down ESG issues into a more manageable level, and a materiality assessment helps clarify what ESG issues have the most significant relevance and impact on a business. To define materiality, a company must identify its biggest risks and vulnerabilities using a ‘risk matrix,’ based on its profile and negative impact on a business.
For example, a leading pharmaceutical company may decide to focus on waste reduction and eco-friendly packaging (the environmental element), employee health and safety (the social element), stringent product quality, and robust data privacy practices (the governance element) for ESG reporting as these areas of business have the most significant impact in their industry. Their focus on these aspects of operations means they must use an ESG framework covering all three environmental, social, and governance aspects.
Companies can choose from two types of materiality assessments:
Financial materiality: Where ESG risks impact a company’s value. Frameworks like SASB2 focus on this.
Double materiality: Where issues related to ‘financial’ and ‘people and environment’ impact. Frameworks like GRI3 focus on this.
Assess where Impact is largest
Companies must consider ESG factors that they can directly impact with agility. Understanding the level of impact using a matrix like the ‘impact effort prioritization matrix’ can help companies gain valuable information that can guide them in choosing an ESG framework best suited to them. In the automobile industry, companies may have significant control over the sourcing of raw materials and ethical manufacturing practices that can be considered an ESG factor.
Assess industry peers and company-type suitability
It's crucial to evaluate which ESG frameworks are better suited to specific industries and company types. Different frameworks have varying focuses and are designed to cater to the unique needs of different sectors. For instance, frameworks like SASB are more tailored towards industries with significant financial impacts from sustainability issues, while GRI might be more applicable to organizations looking for comprehensive sustainability reporting. Other reporting frameworks like Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) are specifically created to analyze the ESG impact of real estate and infrastructure portfolios.
Gaining insights into what ESG frameworks your peers and competitors in the industry are using can also be instrumental in planning the right strategy. An Alliance for Corporate Transparency report in 2020 showed that 70% of companies in Central and Southern-Eastern Europe use the GRI framework for reporting ESG metrics.
Stakeholder recognition
When choosing an ESG framework, consider its credibility and acceptance by industry stakeholders. A widely recognized and respected framework in your industry will likely have more impact and be more beneficial in terms of stakeholder engagement and trust.
For instance, financiers, investors, boards, and creditors may prefer frameworks like the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) or the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). Alternatively, stakeholders like governments or regulatory bodies may find frameworks like Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR) or National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (NGER) ideal.
However, suppose you’re planning to report on the ESG metrics for the first time and do not have an investor-specific use case. In that case, it is recommended that you choose a flexible framework that targets a larger stakeholder group.
Global Recognition
The geographic location of an organization dictates what frameworks are accepted and acknowledged in the region. Recognition by regulatory bodies, investors, and industry peers can influence the effectiveness and acceptance of frameworks. In some countries, reporting is often mandated by law, while in other cases, the framework is specific to a region’s local situations.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) is a crucial framework in modern business, focusing on sustainable environmental practices, social responsibility, and ethical governance. Adopting ESG models like GRI, SASB, TCFD, and CDP is essential for guiding organizations toward sustainable and responsible practices tailored to their specific goals and industry contexts.
Developing and implementing an ESG strategy involves understanding ESG principles, setting goals, integrating these into business operations, and engaging in continuous monitoring and adaptation. This approach not only aligns with regulatory standards but also enhances corporate reputation, risk management, and long-term value creation. ESG represents a commitment to balancing economic growth with ecological sustainability and social welfare.
Are you looking to drive sustainable solutions in your business?
Partner with Futurize to spearhead innovation programs that bring together academic institutions, governments, corporations, and startups to generate groundbreaking ideas and ventures for a sustainable future. Get in touch with us!
